AIM Sport v Supponor [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat) – Edward acted for AIM Sport in their successful patent infringement claim against Supponor. Mr Justice Meade found AIM Sport’s patent to be both valid and infringed. The claim related to AIM Sport’s technology for virtual advertising in sports stadiums, which allows in-stadium advertising boards to be […]
Related Barrister Case List: Ed Cronan
Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat)
Edward acted for Teva in successfully resisting an application by Neurim and Flynn Pharma for an interim injunction to restrain Teva’s dealing in its generic prolonged-release Melatonin pharmaceutical product. Led by Charlotte May QC. […]
Commscope v SOLiD Technologies [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat)
Edward acted for the successful defendant, SOLiD technologies, in this patent trial relating to digital DAS technologies for point to multipoint distribution of RF telecommunications over fibre optic cables. The patent in suit was revoked for reason of obviousness and anticipation. READ MORE: Commscope v SOLiD Technologies [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat) – […]
Read More… from Commscope v SOLiD Technologies [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat)
Thom Browne Inc. v Adidas AG and Adidas International Marketing B.V.
Thom Browne Inc. v Adidas AG and Adidas International Marketing B.V. Edward Cronan acts for the fashion designer Thom Browne in this claim for revocation of nineteen Adidas trade marks, in which the well known sportswear brand Adidas counterclaims for an injunction against the sale of goods bearing the Thom Browne four bar design. Led […]
Read More… from Thom Browne Inc. v Adidas AG and Adidas International Marketing B.V.
Advanced Bionics v MED-EL
Advanced Bionics v MED-EL Edward Cronan acted for Advanced Bionics in this medical industry claim for a DNI and for revocation of a patent relating to an MRI-compatible cochlear implant system. Led by Andrew Lykiardopoulos QC. […]
Nokia Technologies v OnePlus Technology
UK Patents Court: Overseas Defendants no exception to commitment to 12 month trial timetable In ongoing patent infringement proceedings between Nokia and the phone manufacturer Oppo the Patents Court has demonstrated that it remains serious about achieving its trial time estimates, even for overseas defendants. The Patents Court first committed to a 12 month timetable […]
Philip Morris v RAI: British American Tobacco – patent for heated tobacco device revoked for lack of inventive step and added matter
This was a bid by Philip Morris to revoke two British American Tobacco patents revoked for obviousness and added matter. The trial was expedited in order to provide Philip Morris with commercial certainty in relation to their marketing of IQOS heated tobacco devices in the UK (see picture above) and in order […]
