The High Court did not believe that Monster didn’t intend to benefit from the Red Bull brand “‘Red Dawg’ will in fact, whether that is what Monster subjectively intended or not, be given a free-ride, and will therefore gain an unfair commercial advantage,” Judge Johnson. Monster had applied to register a U.K. trademark for “Red […]
Read More… from Monster Energy Co. v. Red Bull GmbH – CH-2021-000211
Strike Out Refused: WaterRower could be a work of artistic craftsmanship The Defendant sought to strike out the Claimant’s claim for infringement of copyright in its water resistance rowing machine (the WaterRower), on the basis that the WaterRower did not meet the requirements to be a “work of artistic craftsmanship” within the meaning of s.4(1)(c) […]
Read More… from WaterRower (UK) Ltd v Liking Ltd (T/A Topiom) [2022] EWHC 2084 (IPEC)
5 New Square
Lincoln's Inn
London
WC2A 3RJ
