Chambers & Partners 2023
Intellectual Property: “Ben is great to work with and slotted very easily into our extended team.”
Legal 500 2023
Intellectual Property: “Extremely easy to work with, insightful, and a real team player with no airs and graces. Ben’s advocacy is patient but firm.”
Chambers & Partners 2022
Intellectual Property: “He is exceptionally bright and practical.”
Legal 500 2022
Intellectual Property: “Ben is an incredibly personable and engaging barrister, who builds a strong rapport with instructing solicitors and lay clients alike. His advice is always insightful.”
Chambers & Partners 2021
Intellectual Property: “He gives really good and commercially sensible advice.”
Legal 500 2021
Intellectual Property: “A talented junior with whom it is a pleasure to work with.”
Chambers & Partners 2020
Intellectual Property: “I rate him very highly as he is a thoughtful lawyer and is very useful to have on the team.”
Legal 500 2020
Intellectual Property: “An excellent junior, always very calm and easy to deal with.”
Chambers & Partners 2019
Intellectual Property: “Consistently excellent. His advice is brilliant, he’s incredibly practical and I have never worked with counsel whom I would be more happy to introduce to clients.”
Chambers & Partners 2018
Intellectual Property: “He is very hard-working, diligent and works well with solicitors.” “He is extremely good with clients.”
Chambers & Partners 2017
Intellectual Property: “He is a real talent whose experience, advice and approach are far beyond his years.” “He is a very focused and clever barrister, and is extremely good to work with.”
Legal 500 2017
Intellectual Property: “Hardworking and incisive.”
World Trade Mark Review 2017
“often on the frontlines of complex patent cases, he is also a frequent flier in trade mark contentions.”
Chambers & Partners 2016
Intellectual Property: “An exceptional junior who provides clear advice and never sits on the fence.”
Legal 500 2016
Intellectual Property: “Extremely personable, with a calm and authoritative manner.”
Chambers & Partners 2014
Intellectual Property: “A highly rated junior of four years’ call who is already gaining attention among top IP solicitors as a skilful barrister, who is particularly adept at complicated patent disputes. He quickly gets to grips with complex technical patent cases. He is a real team player and a joy to work with.”
Ben is regarded in Who’s Who Legal 2015.
Patents
Interdigital Technology Corp v Lenovo Group – technical trials C and E [2023] EWHC 172 Pat – the third and fifth technical trials in a very high-value series of infringement and validity trials of the claimant’s patents covering various aspects of mobile telecommunications technology
Advance Bionics v Med-El [2022] EWHC 1345 (Pat) – patent case concerning magnetic arrangement within cochlear implants
Commscope v SoliD [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat) – patent dispute about distributed antenna systems, such as WiFi or cellular networks on the London Underground
Excel-Eucan v Source Vagabond Systems [2019] EWHC 3175 (Pat) – patent dispute about ammunition-carrying bags for battlefield deployment
Thoratec Europe v AIS [2017] EWHC 146 (Pat) – patent dispute relating to catheter-driven blood pumps for transcutaneous insertion into the heart
Thoratec Europe Limited v. AIS GmbH Aachen Innovative Solutions [2016] EWHC 2367 (Pat) – A medical device patent dispute concerning two patents for catheter-based blood pumps for providing cardiac support via femoral insertion.
Nicocigs Limited v. Fontem Holdings 1 BV [2016] EWHC 2161 (Pat) – A patent infringment and validity dispute concerning electronic cigarettes.
Vringo Infrastructure v ZTE UK [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat) – Acted as junior for Vringo, whose 3G/LTE network handover patent was found to be valid and infringed.
HTC v Gemalto [2014] EWCA Civ 1335 – Junior counsel for HTC, defeated Gemalto’s appeal against earlier finding of non-infringement. HTC also secured a narrower construction of the patent as part of the appeal.
HTC v Gemalto [2013] EWHC 1876 (Pat) – Junior counsel in multi-patent action relating to mobile phone technology and Java programming.
Schenck Rotec v Universal Balancing [2012] EWHC 1920 (Pat) – Trial of validity and infringement of a patent about balancing prop shafts and other axles and rotors.
Wagner International v Earlex [2012] EWHC 984 (Pat) – Patent dispute about paint spray guns, including issues of prior user and added matter.
Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
Illiquidx v Altana – long-running confidential information and trade secrets dispute concerning the idea of setting up a fund to invest in distressed Venezuelan debt. Appeal to be heard by Court of Appeal in June 2025.
First instance judgment – [2025] EWHC 299 (Ch)
Costs judgment – [2025] EWHC 1566 (Ch)
Judgment on remedies available to claimant – [2025] EWHC 1483 (Ch)
Zuora Inc v Laxman (judgment not published) – Successful application for without-notice non-disclosure injunction against the individual defendant, who was accused of wrongfully accessing and saving copies of highly sensitive internal company documents prior to his impending departure for a new job with a competitor.
Tether Investments Limited & 2040 Energy Limited v Electric Solidus Inc t/a Swan Bitcoin – Advising on IP aspects of the defendant’s response to an interim proprietary injunction relating to business assets of a joint venture involved in mining bitcoin; assets include a very substantial quantity of bitcoin.
Designs
Original Beauty Technology v G4K Fashion [2021] EWHC 1848 (Ch) – design right dispute relating to fast fashion and bodycon glamour wear
Pulse On v Garmin Europe Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138 – appeal to Court of Appeal in design right case about LED arrangement on reverse of fitness watches
PulseOn OY v Garmin (Europe) Limited [2018] EWHC 47 (Ch) – Registered and unregistered design right dispute concerning the arrangement of LEDs and photodetector on the reverse of wrist-worn heart-rate monitoring devices. Substantial questions of fact concerning the issue of copying (multiple witnesses giving the defendant’s detailed design narrative), plus detailed legal questions on the relevance of technical function to the layouts in dispute. Led by Hugo Cuddigan QC.
John Kaldor Fabricmaker UK v Lee Ann Fashions [2014] EWHC 3779 (IPEC) – Successfully represented defendant against allegations of copying and infringement in relation to fabric designs.
Louver-Lite Ltd v Harris Parts Ltd (t/a Harris Engineering) [2012] EWPCC 53 – Patents County Court trial of registered design right dispute concerning head rails for blinds. Won on both infringement and validity.
Ningbo Beifa v Schwan-Stabilo – Revocation action relating to Community registered designs in highlighter pens. Advised and helped prepare second appeal to the General Court of the CJEU, following that Court’s earlier judgment and the subsequent reappraisal by the Boards of Appeal of OHIM.
Trade marks
Property Renaissance t/a Titanic Spa v Stanley Dock Hotel t/a Titanic Hotel [2016] EWHC 3103 (Ch) – trade mark and passing off dispute concerning ‘Titanic’ branding
Property Renaissance Ltd T/A Titanic Spa v Stanley Dock Hotel Ltd T/A Titanic Hotel Liverpool and Ors. [2016] EWHC 3103 (Ch) – Trade mark dispute for invalidity including the principle of own name defence involving an appeal from the UKIPO against a ruling that late evidence should not be admitted, an IPEC trade mark infringement case and a High Court trade mark infringement case. The judgment considered the comparison between the registered trade marks TITANIC SPA, TITANIC QUARTER and the sign TITANIC HOTEL. Held that TITANIC HOTEL infringed TITANIC SPA which was not too similar to TITANIC QUARTER. It also considered the own-name defence.
Vince v EUIPO [2016] EUECJ T-315/15 – Appeal to the General Court of the European Court of Justice in relation to the refusal to register the mark ELECTRONIC HIGWAY.
UK Trade Mark Nos. 3039661 & 3039690 – HOGS & HEIFERS – Appeal to the Appointed Person where marks in the UK were a direct copy of marks in the USA, giving rise to a dispute about bad faith
PLYMOUTH LIFE CENTRE trade mark O/236/13 – Appeal to the Appointed Person over the use of the disputed mark in relation to sports facilities.
HAJI BABA trade mark O/186/12 – Successfully resisted opposition to the mark HAJI BABA by the proprietor of the mark HAJI.
PORTMEIRION trade mark O/342/12 – Acted for Portmeirion Limited and the Trustees of Ymddiriedolaeth Clough Williams-Ellis Foundation in a dispute over an application to register the word PORTMEIRION in relation to certain services.
GURU JOSH PROJECT trade mark O/308/12 – Acted for DJ Guru Josh in a successful appeal before the Appointed Person, involving allegations of bad faith against a former business partner who registered the mark in question.
ROBOT WARS trade mark O/090/11 – Successful invalidation action before the UKIPO, representing the companies behind the popular television series “Robot Wars”.
ALLORO trade mark O/464/11 – Combined opposition/invalidation proceedings. Succeeded in defeating the opposition by partial invalidation of the Opponent’s earlier mark.
Copyright
Penhallurick v MD5 [2021] EWHC 293 (IPEC) – copyright dispute about source code for virtual forensic computing software
Front Door t/a Richard Reid Associates v Lower Mill Estate [2021] EWHC 2324 (TCC) – successful strike out and refusal of joinder in a copyright and passing off dispute relating to architects’ drawings
ATB Sales v Rich Energy [2019] EWHC 1207 (IPEC) – copyright infringement concerning stag’s-head logo copied and used by energy drink brand
Slater v Wimmer [2012] EWPCC 7 – Trial in the Patents County Court, acting for defendant who was being sued for copyright infringement. Issues included implied terms as to equitable ownership in commissioned works.
Casey v Talkback Thames – Acted for the defendant television production company, obtaining summary judgment against claimant who was suing for copyright infringement relating to the format of a sitcom.
Phonographic Performance Limited / PRS for Musc v various parties – Ben has obtained hundreds of injunctions in the High Court against defendants who have infringed copyrights owned by Phonographic Performance Limited and PRS for Music by playing sound recordings in public.
Other
Stone v Wenman – [2021] EWHC 2546 (IPEC) – trade mark and passing off dispute between two spiritualist practitioners in the field of archangelic healing
Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWCA Civ 266 – appeal on part of High Court proceedings, concerning status of documents disclosed in different time zones around the world
AI Claims Solutions v Plusnet – obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order for disclosure of the name of a broadband subscriber suspected of sending malicious and harassing emails.
Ben was also involved in a number of significant cases during his pupillage, including:
SAS Institute v World Programming [2010] EWHC 1829 – software functionality and copyright infringement.
Diageo North America v Intercontinental Brands [2010] EWHC 17 – ‘Extended form’ passing off relating to ‘VODKAT’. The case later went to Court of Appeal: [2010] EWCA Civ 920.
Folding Attic Stairs v The Loft Stairs Company (settled after first day of trial) – damages inquiry for patent infringement.
Chancery Bar Association
IP Bar Association
Qualifications
BA (Math) 2000
Anthony Bessemer Clark scholar 2007
Lord Justice Holker scholar 2008
(Gray’s Inn)
Called to the Bar, Gray’s Inn, 2009
Regulation
Ben is a self-employed, independent barrister whose practice is governed by the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales. He is registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales (Bar Ref: 55808)
He has professional indemnity insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund (BMIF Ref: 2190/056). Please refer to the BMIF website for full details of the world-wide cover provided, and the BMIF’s contact details.
Ben’s legal experience includes major patent litigation, as well as actions in trade marks, passing off, copyright, design right, domain names, confidential information and comparative advertising. He has appeared as a junior in the Court of Appeal in a range of patent, design and trade mark cases, most recently Advanced Bionics AG v Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerat, and has acted in numerous High Court and IPEC trials spanning the full range of IP. Ben has also appeared at the General Court in Luxembourg.
As part of his early work, Ben spent seven months on secondment to a major firm of patent litigation solicitors. This has given him invaluable knowledge and insight into the litigation process, including case strategy and the instruction and handling of expert witnesses.
Ben is co-author of A User’s Guide to Trade Marks & Passing Off (along with Hogarth’s Nicholas Caddick QC). His other publication credits include co-editing the intellectual property chapter of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, co-editing Copinger & Skone James on Copyright, and extensive research on Moral Rights.
In 2012 Ben was the UK’s National Rapporteur to the International League of Competition Law (LIDC).
Ben plays classical guitar and also enjoys marathons, photography and travel.
